Skip to main content

Coronavirus still proves Africa's Local Manufacturing Problem

As countries scramble to meet the explosion in demand of medical supplies through locally manufactured alternatives, Kenyans have been wondering why the country even imports. Such optimism misses the fact that such factories are located in protected EPZs rather than across the country (Image of Shona EPZ from Ministry of Health's Twitter Page)

For many people in Africa, more so Sub-Saharan Africa, local manufacturing is a concept we are very much in love with. We wish that our countries manufactured 90 percent of what we used locally, and by doing so, our feeling is that our countries would become developed countries.

Of course, manufacturing 90% of all locally consumed products means we would only import 10%. Early in school, we are taught that 1+3=4, and likewise 4-3=1.

Equally, if by manufacturing 90% locally means that we import very little, then the assumption is that importing very little means we manufacture a lot locally. And so, many people call for the banning of imports to promote local manufacturing.

Most governments understand that banning imports is hard, and so what they do is raise taxes on them. But interesting enough, raising taxes on imports does not lead to increased local manufacturing. Instead, it leads to a decrease in local manufacturing.

In 1981, manufacturing contributed to a quarter of sub-Saharan African economic output according to the Brookings’ Institute. This has gradually fallen to 10% today, or less than half of where we were in 1981. This is despite the effort of many African countries to ban imports, or more practically, to tax them out of existence.

So, what is happening - why do efforts to manufacture more lead to less manufacturing?

Well, simply put, banning imports to promote exports or local manufacturing is like deciding that you need to cook better food than your neighbour, but instead of improving your cooking skills, you ban your neighbour from cooking!

Sure, if your neighbour does not cook and you cook, logically, you have made better food than they have by virtue of them not participating in the comparison. But if they are better at cooking and they keep cooking, then your strategy to ban them from cooking becomes hard to implement since you have no control over them.

In turn, African countries should not be focusing on so called “import-substitution” policies, but should rather focus on local manufacturing as an issue on its own.

The problem with local manufacturing is that you can not do it without imports. Looking at the world’s top 20 exporters, only Brazil and Russia fail to feature in the world’s top 20 importers. Brazil is a heavy agricultural producer and Russia exports a lot of minerals, both being raw materials rather than manufactured produce. They are also not far off, featuring in the list of top 30 importers. The world's 4 largest exporters are also the world’s 4 largest importers.

Manufacturing is defined as value addition, rather than local production. So this means that manufacturing involves a lot of taking what already exists, then adding something small to it and you end up with a finished product.

For instance, African countries are obsessed with car manufacturing. Top car manufacturing countries like Japan and Germany happen to import a lot of car parts. Japan, which is a global car manufacturing giant, has cars among its top 10 imports!

In fact, Japan and South Korea are notoriously known as countries that barely fully produce anything locally - they import everything they produce. South Korea makes both the chipsets that run our smartphones and the ships that bring in our oil, but the silicon and iron needed for both are all imported to Korea.

Kenya largely manufactures the cooking oil and soap it consumes, but it relies on crude palm oil imports from Malaysia to manufacture cooking oil. Sure, we can grow oil palms locally, but that would involve either replacing maize or sugarcane as much of Kenya is arid and semi arid. To top that, we still import sugar and maize because we do not produce enough locally.

Kenya is also a leading tea exporter, and in fact we can almost entirely manufacture tea without any imports. But we need to import the ink that prints the tea packages for export, and we need to import the fuel and truck that will transport the tea to Mombasa for loading on a ship. We also need to import the spares for the machines at the tea processing factory.

In short, it is quite difficult to adopt an almost 100% export policy. The more you export, the more you import because of the very many things that are needed in value addition.

Even further proof can be seen in the disruption brought about by the coronavirus that has led to disruption of air and sea freight between countries and the shutting of factories in top exporters like China. With Kenya’s borders almost closed, local manufacturing could never have been easier. Yet, we were almost facing a crisis of items running out if shipping does not resume.

What we are seeing is that even with the shutting of borders and absence of imports, the problems that make manufacturing locally persist.

In Kenya, the Ministry of Health’s Twitter page has been posting images of locally manufactured Personal Protective Equipment. Notably, this manufacturing is taking place in an Export Processing Zone.

All local manufacturing is good, no? Well, The Economist found that most of the investment and benefits of Export Processing Zones(EPZs) do not go to the local economy, save for the jobs created - which are also not so much high paying. EPZs are exempted from paying taxes and therefore much of the revenue and in turn the profit goes back to the investor’s home country or some other country.

More importantly, there is the question why such manufacturing thrives hidden away in EPZs rather than in the rest of the country. Many manufacturers in Kenyan have pointed out that it would be cheaper if their factories were located in other countries and they simply sold the finished product here.

That tells us we have a local manufacturing problem. Much has been documented about it. Electricity prices are high because some of the power producers are expensive, politically connected outfits.

Moving things and setting up a factory is very costly. Everyone from the politicians at the top, to the governor, to the chief, the police and government inspector all want some form of payment to not frustrate you. After all, the fact that you own a factory and dozens of vehicles to transport things shows you are "rich". The general population equally regards any ownership of some form of capital as proof of bottomless riches. This leads to doom if your factory operates in a sector with low profits or if you simply hit a rough patch.

Looking at publicly listed companies, we can equally see that firms in the service sector are consistently more profitable than those in manufacturing.

In a simple analogy, the public can tell how much a cement or beer company is selling based on how many trucks from the company we see around, which we can also stop and demand bribes or taxes from.

It is however very hard to tell how profitable a bank is from looking at its vehicles or how many buildings it has, and therefore it is very hard to extort money out of a bank. The governor can not simply walk into the local bank branch and demand to shut it down and in turn disrupt its operations, but they can do so for a factory.

The cost of delivering a service does not grow proportionally to the quantity you sell. A bank does not consume more electricity or need more trucks to issue more loans, but a factory does. So services are more profitable.

Which then makes you wonder which sane person would invest in manufacturing rather than in services?

It sounds like a cliche, but the extent of corruption is the number one reason why African countries don’t manufacture. Sure, it is cheaper to make toothpicks in China, but it is insanely expensive to attempt to make them in Kenya you would even wonder why you tried.

For African countries to become manufacturing giants, they must address their “eating” problem. As the proverb says, we can’t have our cake and eat it. The more we demand to eat, the lesser the size of the cake. It doesn’t even matter if we ban cake from other countries, our appetite is still too much!

We must decide if local investors need to be supported, or whether they need to be eaten from the way termites slowly eat away your door until it falls off.


Popular posts from this blog

Beers in Kenya: A sober opinion

Note: This is a dated post and has since been mostly passed by events. SAB Miller beers including Castle and Peroni are no longer widely available in Kenya after their exist. Sirville Brewery was bought out by Brew Bistro before being permanently shut in a tax dispute. Kenya is a land of milk, honey, beaches and taxes. I have penned, or is typed, a newer post here

I have had a short beer swigging stint in my life. It has however been long enough for me to share my opinion of Kenyan beer. Interestingly, over the course of sharing such opinions with other drunkards connoisseurs,  I have found that we all have different views as to what beer is the best, which one makes you too drunk, or which one gives one free, extra hangover for every hangover you get from it.
For starters, like everyone else, I discovered that beer isn’t as sweet as it looks like in those adverts that show golden barley swaying in breezes, happy men smiling and toasting chilled, foaming glasses of beer as a deep voi…

The bitter story of the downfall of Mumias Sugar company

Have you heard the bitter story of Mumias Sugar?

Regarded by many as Kenya's most successful sugar miller, Mumias Sugar Company was a disaster waiting to happen.

Many pointed out how Mumias Sugar Company was a fortress in the wreck that is Kenya's sugar industry, only unaware that it was just a matter of time. As the old wise men said, "Ukiona cha mwenzako cha nyolewa, tia chako maji".

The proverb means that if you see your neighbour's head getting shaved, your head will soon be undergoing the same - you'd therefore better wet your head for a smoother shave, otherwise you will be forced to undergo a painful, dry, shave.

But what ails Kenya's sugar industry?

The Kenya sugar industry is under legal siege. The typical Kenyan issue of coming up with laws to tackle a problem is evident here.

Many of Kenya's sugar factories are owned by the government, and have slowly declined under mismanagement and corruption. The appointing of political cronies and trib…

The Bible. Why you should read your Bible.

After reading what The Candid Tin man had to say about the Bible on his blog, I felt a disappointed man. In my opinion, the candid Tin man had committed the same errors of omission and commission that have plagued the Bible for centuries.

In the beginning, the Roman Catholic church was the dominant church worldwide, and the bible existed in Latin language which common folk like me and you did not understand. Latin was a dead language used by the priests of the roman Catholic church and perhaps a few scholars.

The Roman Catholic church aimed at controlling the public's opinion , as the church still does today, and especially their opinion of what was God's word. Therefore, back then, if you needed to understand God's word, you had to consult the Roman Catholic Priests to read the Bible for youa nd then tell you what it said. How well they did this and their intentions remained questionable, with accusations directed at the Roman Catholic Church for mistranslating The Bible…

Why do people vote for Cruel Leaders?

Why do Kenyans, or any other electorate for that matter, vote for cruel politicians or so-called leaders?
The common argument is that the voters are ignorant, or were “misled” or had “no option”. But this is not true.

People know who and what they are voting for. People intentionally vote for cruel politicians especially when the voters form part of a majority - clan, tribe, race, nation, class or other majority.
It is not that they do not know the politicians are cruel. They simply assume that the cruelty will be experienced by others - the minority - and will never be experienced by them. They deal with the conscience by arguing that those experiencing cruelty must have done something wrong to deserve it.

Why we loved Mixcrate and Where to next?

There are two types of music listeners: those who listen by artist or by album, and those who listen by top hits. The second lot of us do not care much about what other music made it to an album besides the top 2 hits.

Mixcrate served the second lot of us very well. You could search for a song title or an artist, and you would have dozens of DJ mixes to choose from which contained more than the one hit you searched for.

Listening to music on Mixcrate also meant that once you settled into a mix, you had uninterrupted music for the next one hour.